Facebook is approaching big-name news publishers hoping to secure licensing deals to republish stories and other news content, reports The Wall Street Journal.
The deals could be worth millions of dollars per publisher, with
Facebook reportedly offering up to $3 million a year for licensing
rights for some outlets. Among those in early discussions are
Disney-owned ABC News, Bloomberg, Dow Jones (also the parent company of
the WSJ), and The Washington Post.
According to the report, Facebook plans to include these
articles as part of dedicated news section its launching sometime this
fall. Publishers would sign deals lasting as long as three years in some
cases, and they would get control over how articles appear on Facebook
and whether readers would receive only snippets, like a headline and
some text, before being sent to the publisher’s website. The proposed
terms stand in contrast to Apple’s approach to Apple News Plus, its new,
magazine-focused subscription service with a dubious revenue share and reportedly poor payout metrics that has had many in the media industry warning against Silicon Valley’s pledge to rescue the news business.
The result of a successful Facebook courting, however,
could be a revival of the massive amount of referral traffic Facebook
used to drive to news publishers and media companies before it began
downgrading pages and other, non-individualized forms of News Feed
content a few years ago. Following the WSJ report, Facebook confirmed to CNBC that it was indeed launching a new, dedicated news tab this fall.
The push would be an evolution of Facebook’s ever-changing approach to news, which most recently has seen Facebook promote local content and ditch a plan to move publishers into a separate feed in its mobile app.
Previous efforts have included deals with publishers to make video for
its Facebook Live platform, deals with media and entertainment companies
to license content and create original content for its Watch platform,
and the ill-fated Instant Articles platform that Facebook once hoped would become a dominant standard for news stories.
Last year, Facebook seemed to pull back on its
relationship with publishers, with the company’s head of news
partnerships, Campbell Brown, telling them to get off the platform if they did’t like it, and the company slashing Watch funding for news shows back in December. A few months prior to Brown’s statement, Rupert Murdoch, the executive chairman of publishing empire News Corporation, called on Facebook and Google to effectively subsidize the news business after destroying and replacing it with an algorithm-driven mess.
Overall, Facebook’s relationship with the news industry
has been highly contentious. As it began attracting astronomical daily
usage, Facebook siphoned away eyeballs and ad dollars from news sites.
Alongside Google, Facebook now controls a majority of the digital
advertising industry in the US, having effectively captured huge swaths
of online ad revenue from newspapers, magazines, and digital media
companies over the last decade or so.
In turn, Facebook also became a place where publishers
hoped they could attract new readers and existing ones at unprecedented
volumes. And for a while, that was true, with Facebook becoming a major
source of traffic for all forms of media companies worldwide. The whims
of the algorithms driving the Facebook News Feed became hugely
influential in driving media trends, like the early 2010s rise in
clickbait and the eventual, and economically fraught, shift to video.
But just as Facebook proved it could capture an audience
and send it wherever it pleased, it could also take it away. As the
company began running into issues with younger users abandoning the
platform, it began de-prioritizing the types of content published by pages. It chose instead to start promoting the content of friends and family
in hopes that would keep users from flocking to newer, more engaging
social networks like Snapchat and its own subsidiary, Instagram. The
result was the floor being pulled out from under a number of media companies, many of which suffered layoffs due to the steep drop-off in referral traffic and video views.
Now, Facebook appears to be willing to try its hand yet
again at news, although this time on seemingly friendlier terms. The
company is still in the midst of years-long controversy over its failure
to reckon with its influence on society and the ways bad actors have
manipulated its platform. And now, the company wants to bring publishers
back in hopes it can reestablish itself as a destination for
authoritative news and genuine discussion.
The issue, of course, is the past few years of rampant
misinformation, fake news, and election interference that have often
made Facebook an untrustworthy place to spend your time online. (That’s
not to mention the scores of data privacy scandals that have eroded user
trust in the platform’s integrity and the motives of the executives
overseeing it.)
Whether its bots pushing propaganda, or digital detritus
filling the News Feed with junk you don’t want from people or pages you
don’t care about, Facebook has transformed into a little more than a
digital yearbook and Rolodex for an aging class of social media users.
Whether those same users are prepared, or even willing, to start getting
their news from Facebook is an open question.
It’s also not clear what will come of this renewed effort
to court publishers back to Facebook, but it’s clear the company sees
its massive cash reserves as the key to winning journalists back to the
table.
Credit goes to - TheVerge
0 comments:
ဤဝက်ဆိုဒ်သည် ယူနီကုဒ်စံစနစ် ကိုလိုက်နာကျင့်သုံးထားပါသဖြင့် Comment များကို ယူနီကုဒ်ဖောင့်ဖြင့်သာ မှတ်ချက်ပေးစေလိုပါသည်။
စိတ်ဝင်တစားဖတ်ရှုခြင်းအား ကျေးဇူးအထူးတင်ရှိပါသည်။
Rabbit Converter ကိုအသုံးပြု၍ ဖောင့်ပြောင်းလဲနိုင်ပါသည်။